Thoughts about the legal argumentation in the judicial practice

dc.contributor	LUCELY MARTINA CARBALLO SOLIS
dc.coverage.spatial	Difusión
dc.creator	MELBA ANGELINA MENDEZ FERNANDEZ
dc.creator	CARLOS ALBERTO MACEDONIO HERNANDEZ
dc.date	2020-07-01
dc.date.accessioned	2021-06-22T17:40:25Z
dc.date.available	2021-06-22T17:40:25Z
dc.identifier	http://www.davidpublisher.org/Home/Journal/UCLR
dc.identifier.uri	http://redi.uady.mx:8080/handle/123456789/5187
dc.description.abstract	Legal argumentation is a discipline of philosophy, whose objective is to interpret the norm regarding the facts presented by the parties in a judicial process. As a consequence, various models of evaluating the facts in real life have appeared, and to be presented by means of argumentation before the judges. Consequently, there are several theories to solve each and every one of these types of problems. Therefore, it is necessary to train judges on legal argumentation, which will help them decide over the most difficult cases they are presented.
dc.language	eng
dc.publisher	US-China Law Review
dc.relation	citation:0
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.source	urn:issn:1548-6605
dc.subject	info:eu-repo/classification/cti/5
dc.subject	CIENCIAS SOCIALES
dc.subject	info:eu-repo/classification/cti/4
dc.subject	HUMANIDADES Y CIENCIAS DE LA CONDUCTA
dc.subject	Judicial practice
dc.subject	Legal argumentation
dc.subject	Complex cases
dc.title	Thoughts about the legal argumentation in the judicial practice
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/article